Blueprint for Canada is a major public policy experiment designed to give Canadians a voice. If you support the majority of positions taken on this platform please share our website with your social network both online and in real life. Most importantly, please consider emailing this website's address (www.blueprintforcanada.ca) to your elected representative and ask them to make the "Blueprint for Canada" K-12 education platform policies the standard for public education in your province or territory. Find your local Member of the Provincial Parliament (MPP), Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA), or Member of the National Assembly (MNA) (Quebec) here. Add your voice today to those of tens of thousands of other parents, grandparents, legal guardians, and concerned citizens all across the country standing up for Canada.
As school board trustees we will
advocate for the following:
- Our preferred option is to advocate for the abolition of public school boards entirely. With modern internet-based voting solutions, they are redundant. The preferable model of school governance should be direct online voting for most policy-making by registered parents and guardians of children attending any given public school. Policy proposals could be put forward by any registered parent or guardian which would be applicable only to their own children's school rather than entire boards. All other parents and guardians with children in the same school could then vote electronically via a website on the proposal in question with a simple majority vote needed to carry. This approach would empower parents and enhance democratic decision-making for each individual school. We have no affiliation with this company but will highlight one example of such a voting solution. Election Buddy is based in Edmonton, Canada. Their website highlights the application of their system in public K-12 schools. We recognize that some limits would need to be imposed for HR issues and budgetary matters, however, the goal of empowering parents makes this an attractive option. We would propose that the provincial government entertain this idea of a trial basis for selected public schools across the province
- With elected trustees there is a known issue of some trustees acting only on behalf of their own constituents. One option is to have elections or appointments for trustees at large. If elected, voters would all choose from the same list of candidates, regardless of their constituency.
- We will advocate the trustees be limited to serving two terms be they consecutive or not.
- We propose that school board trustee "Codes of Conduct" rules should be limited to matters of proper governance. Trustees should not be subject to ideological constraints imposed under the guise of "Codes of Conduct" or ideologically rooted interpretations of the Ontario Human Rights Code. Such codes are invariably weaponized to silence trustees who speak out on contentious unsettled social and cultural issues. Legislation should unequivocally protect the right of elected trustees to speak freely even on highly divisive issues.
- Questioning or opposing any school board policy (including new policy proposals or existing policies) during or outside of board meetings, privately or publicly, in any form must be explicitly permitted under the Code of Conduct. Doing so will not be deemed a violation of the duty of fiduciary care.
- We would propose that censure-related sanctions should be limited to financial penalties associated with a temporary reduction in honorarium. As elected officials, school board trustees must be able to attend all meetings, receive materials, and participate in committees to represent their constituents. Any sanction process which interferes with their ability to do so effectively robs voters of their elected voice on school boards and is fundamentally undemocratic.
- We reject the idea that trustees should ever be able to silence or reject delegations who speak out on any contentious social or cultural issues impacting our K-12 public schools. Claims that parental delegations should be shut down if their content is perceived to be at odds with the Ontario Human Rights Code or that speaking about contentious topics contributes to an “unsafe environment” are not acceptable as these assertions are subjective and heavily susceptible to ideological bias.
- Trustee meetings should be held in person whenever possible to allow the public to attend.
- We will advocate that the student trustee program be scrapped entirely. We have good reason to believe that the Ontario Student Trustees Association is highly dysfunctional and only serves to ideologically indoctrinate young people.
- Trustees should not be subject to mandatory ideologically rooted training of any sort. This would include training in "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion", "Critical Race Theory", "Gender Ideology", "Intersectionality", "Social Emotional Learning", and "Culturally Responsive Pedagogy", to name but a few. Mandatory training should be limited to matters of proper governance.
WRDSB Trustee @Carla_Johnson had a meltdown and could barely contain her anger at father @davidtodor8 after he exposed a pornographic book accessible by grade schoolers.— Cosmin Dzsurdzsa 🇷🇴 (@cosminDZS) January 25, 2023
"How dare he read that passage publicly in a meeting that's being recorded!" https://t.co/EPnNyIx6kr pic.twitter.com/aVYCzP0mPB
Video shows how parents reacted to Durham District School Board spokesman after he reminded parents that questions on sexually explicit books for little children, mixed gender washrooms, and secret gender transitioning were prohibited. 2/2 @pierre_barns https://t.co/6goUpaUmCd— Jim McMurtry (@JimMcMurtry01) April 18, 2023
Former trustee Dr. Darrell Ferguson brought up concerns about how there was pornographic materials available for kids and this happened:— Cosmin Dzsurdzsa 🇷🇴 (@cosminDZS) February 8, 2023
"I've turned off your mic, just so you know. Have a seat Dr. Ferguson!" shouted @WillowReichelt. pic.twitter.com/qRRDnLWUZI
Censured school board Trustee @TrusteeStone tells her story in her own words. She bravely asked questions about Board policies that concerned her & her constituents, and was censored and barred from fulfilling her duty as elected official. Watch in full at https://t.co/zSo9Io846t pic.twitter.com/ZBoMZkKHne— Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (@JCCFCanada) April 18, 2023
My Judicial Review case against @WRDSB is moving forward!— Carolyn Burjoski (@carolynburjoski) March 20, 2023
My lawyer @_Jorge_Pineda_ from @JCCFCanada provides this video update on my case which is scheduled to be heard in June.
I am so grateful to JCCF for sponsoring my case pro bono.#WRDSB pic.twitter.com/VbcJ5YaYsP